unicorn/prefer-includes Style 
What it does 
Prefer includes() over indexOf() when checking for existence or non-existence. All built-ins have .includes() in addition to .indexOf().
Why is this bad? 
The .includes() method is more readable and less error-prone than .indexOf().
Examples 
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
javascript
if (str.indexOf("foo") !== -1) {}Examples of correct code for this rule:
javascript
if (str.includes("foo")) {}How to use 
To enable this rule in the CLI or using the config file, you can use:
bash
oxlint --deny unicorn/prefer-includesjson
{
  "rules": {
    "unicorn/prefer-includes": "error"
  }
}